Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://irepo.futminna.edu.ng:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/31902
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRaymond, Confidence-
dc.contributor.authorJurkiewicz, Michael T.-
dc.contributor.authorOrunmuyi, Akintunde-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Linshan-
dc.contributor.authorDada, Michael-
dc.contributor.authorLadefoged, Claes-
dc.contributor.authorTeuho, Jarmo-
dc.contributor.authorAnazodo, Udunna-
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-14T07:23:08Z-
dc.date.available2026-07-14T07:23:08Z-
dc.date.issued2023-02-03-
dc.identifier.citationConfidence Raymond, Michael T. Jurkiewicz, Akintunde Orunmuyi, Linshan Liu, Michael Oluwaseun Dada, Claes N. Ladefoged, Jarmo Teuho, Udunna C. Anazodo (2023). The performance of machine learning approaches for attenuation correction of PET in neuroimaging: A meta-analysis. Journal of Neuroradiology, 50(3), 315-326.en_US
dc.identifier.otherDOI: 10.1016/j.neurad.2023.01.157-
dc.identifier.urihttp://irepo.futminna.edu.ng:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/31902-
dc.descriptionhttps://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0150-9861(23)00164-5en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This systematic review provides a consensus on the clinical feasibility of machine learning (ML) methods for brain PET attenuation correction (AC). Performance of ML-AC were compared to clinical standards. Methods: Two hundred and eighty studies were identified through electronic searches of brain PET studies published between January 1, 2008, and August 1, 2022. Reported outcomes for image quality, tissue classifi cation performance, regional and global bias were extracted to evaluate ML-AC performance. Methodological quality of included studies and the quality of evidence of analysed outcomes were assessed using QUADAS-2 and GRADE, respectively. Results: A total of 19 studies (2371 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Overall, the global bias of ML methods was 0.76 § 1.2%. For image quality, the relative mean square error (RMSE) was 0.20 § 0.4 while for tissues classification, the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) for bone/soft tissue/air were 0.82 § 0.1 / 0.95 § 0.03 / 0.85 §0.14. Conclusions: In general, ML-AC performance is within acceptable limits for clinical PET imaging. The sparse information on ML-AC robustness and its limited qualitative clinical evaluation may hinder clinical imple mentation in neuroimaging, especially for PET/MRI or emerging brain PET systems where standard AC approaches are not readily available.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAcademic Medical Organization of Southwestern Ontario (AMOSO) and from Canada First Research Excellence Fund (CFREF) Healthy Brain, Healthy Lives Program (HBHL).Ten_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCurriculum Vitae;3-
dc.subjectMachine learningen_US
dc.subjectAttenuation correctionen_US
dc.subjectSynthetic-CTen_US
dc.subjectNeuroimagingen_US
dc.subjectPET/MRIen_US
dc.subjectPETen_US
dc.subjectBrain PETen_US
dc.subjectSystematic reviewen_US
dc.titleThe performance of machine learning approaches for attenuation correction of PET in neuroimaging: A meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Physics

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
3.pdf313.03 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.