Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://irepo.futminna.edu.ng:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/31300
Title: GIS-BASED MULTI-CRITERIADECISIONANALYSIS(MCDA) FOR OPTIMALSOLIDWASTEDISPOSALSITESELECTIONINJALINGO METROPOLIS,TARABASTATE,NIGERIA
Authors: Gbedu, Adamu Mohammed
Samaila–Ija, H. A
Bako, M
Zitta, N
Atenji, D
Daniya, A
Keywords: Analytical Hierarchy Process
Jalingo Metropolis,
Solid Waste Management
Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis,
Landfill Siting
GIS
Issue Date: 2-Feb-2026
Publisher: coou African Journal of Environmental Research
Series/Report no.: Vol 7, No. 1;
Abstract: Rapid population growth and urban expansion in Jalingo Metropolis, Taraba State, Nigeria, have led to a significant increase in municipal solid waste generation, creating serious environmental and public health challenges. The absence of scientifically selected landfill sites has contributed to indiscriminate waste disposal, land degradation, and potential contamination of nearby water bodies. This study therefore aimed to identify environmentally suitable locations for solid waste disposal using a Geographic Information System (GIS)-based Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) framework. Four key criteria—road accessibility, proximity to drainage networks, buffers around built-up areas, and topographic conditions—were selected in accordance with environmental guidelines and international best practices for landfill siting. Spatial datasets, including QuickBird satellite imagery, Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) Digital Elevation Model (DEM), and municipal geospatial datasets, were processed using ILWIS, ArcGIS, and IDRISI Taiga. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) was applied to determine the relative importance of the criteria, while Boolean overlay techniques were used to define constraint layers. A Weighted Linear Combination (WLC) model was subsequently employed to integrate the criteria and generate a landfill suitability map for the study area. The suitability analysis classified the study area into three categories: highly suitable, moderately suitable, and unsuitable zones for landfill development. Results indicate that 28% of the study area is highly suitable, 17% moderately suitable, and 55% unsuitable for landfill siting. Five potential sites were identified, with Site 3 ranked most suitable due to its accessibility, minimal environmental impact, and land availability. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the model. Findings provide a scientific basis for evidence-based urban solid waste management, offering a practical decision-support tool for local authorities
URI: http://irepo.futminna.edu.ng:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/31300
ISSN: 2714-4461
Appears in Collections:Surveying & Geoinformatics

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Gbedu_et al.pdf487.26 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.