Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://irepo.futminna.edu.ng:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/29524
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTHANKGOD, JOSHUA-
dc.contributor.authorAUDU, ISAH-
dc.contributor.authorABDU;MUDALLIB, IBRAHIM-
dc.contributor.authorABDULLAHI, USMAN-
dc.contributor.authorMOHAMMED LAWAN, DANYARO-
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-12T14:10:09Z-
dc.date.available2025-05-12T14:10:09Z-
dc.date.issued2023-10-05-
dc.identifier.issn2616-1370-
dc.identifier.issn2645 - 2944-
dc.identifier.urihttp://irepo.futminna.edu.ng:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/29524-
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents a comparative analysis of three market price forecast models, namely Geometric Brownian Motion, Artificial Neural Network, and Naive Bayesian techniques, using data from the Nigeria Stock Exchange. The exploratory data analysis results indicate slight variations in the mean and median of the log stock price over a 5-year period. The data shows a relatively small spread from the mean and approximately symmetric distribution, as indicated by a skewness value close to zero. The normality test confirms that the log stock price data follows a normal distribution. The forecast using Artificial Neural Network (ANN) shows a minimal change in future stock price, suggesting low returns and moderate risk in the Nigerian stock market. The graphical representation of the ANN model demonstrates a constant path with little variation. Similarly, the Naive Bayesian technique provides a similar forecast to the ANN model, indicating limited profit potential. The Geometric Brownian Motion model also forecasts little variation in future stock prices, with 2023 showing slightly higher values. The accuracy of the forecast models is evaluated using the Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE). The results indicate that the ANN model has an error of 4.60%, the Naive Bayesian model has an error of 9.29%, and the Geometric Brownian Motion model has an error of 12.67%. These findings suggest that the ANN model performs better in terms of accuracy compared to the other two models.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSELFen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFUDMA Journal of Sciences (FJS)en_US
dc.subjectArtificial Neural Networken_US
dc.subjectNaïve Bayesian Classifiers,en_US
dc.subjectGeometric Brownian Motion,en_US
dc.subjectStock Priceen_US
dc.titleCOMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF GEOMETRIC BROWNIAN MOTION, ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK AND NAIVE BAYESIAN TECHNIQUES USING NIGERIA STOCK EXCHANGE DATAen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Statistics

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ELEVEN.pdf472.72 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.